🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved positions for Indigenous council members on NZ councils will be cut by more than half, following a divisive legislative amendment that required local governments to submit the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more elected officials based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils could only create a Indigenous seat by initially submitting it to a public vote in their region. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time building local support and urging their councils to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted local councils to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating local residents should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated councils that had created a ward under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which concluded on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 decided to retain their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results represented “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the new policy as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to measures designed to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it wants to terminate “race-based” policies, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – most cities mandated to hold referendums backed Māori wards, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

This year’s local government elections recorded the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, prompting demands for reform.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to create different electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Indigenous representation suggested the administration was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement concerned the 17 areas that voted to keep their seats.